Skip to content
Get in touch

Aristotle named the forces. We measure them.

Writing a sentence is almost free now. Knowing what it will do to a particular person is not. The instrument reads both ends: the words on the page, and the person who receives them.

Why an instrument

Labels were the ceiling.

Aristotle named ethos, pathos, logos and kairos. Two thousand years later, Robert Cialdini named six principles of influence. Both are labels. A label tells you a lever is present; it cannot tell you how hard it presses, on whom, or when. Fields stall at the label stage until an instrument arrives: alchemy became chemistry with the balance scale, and astrology became astronomy with the telescope.

The instrument, rung by rung

From the words on the page to one person.

  1. SignalThe message, in order: text by position, audio by time, video by frame.
  2. Rhetorical MassHow much was said: claims, entities, structure, fallacies. The same text always gives the same mass.
  3. Persuasive VelocityHow well it was said, on eight channels, each broken into parts that carry a score and its reasons.
  4. Momentum and forceWhat moved. Force is what it takes to change the course of a conversation.
  5. The personaWho is listening: who they are, what moves them, their state of mind, their setting.
  6. Persuasive ResonanceWhat it did. Four chances, one person, one message, one moment.

Persuasive Velocity

Eight channels.

How well something was said, read on eight channels, each broken into parts that carry a score and its reasons. Every term is defined on persuasion.wiki.

Ethos

Do I believe the source?

Pathos

Does it reach me through feeling?

Logos

Do the steps connect?

Kairos

Is this the right moment, at every scale?

Style

How vividly is it put?

Clarity

Does it feel easy to grasp?

Focus

Does it capture and hold attention?

Awareness

Do I see the move as a move? The channel Pulp cares about most.

What sets it apart

Three ideas the instrument rests on.

Persuasive Resonance

One person, one message, one moment, and four chances that always add up to one. They take it in and it holds up. They take it in and it doesn't. They take it in and reserve judgment. Or it never reaches them. In 2019, valid and invalid were buttons people pressed on each other's arguments. Now they are a measurement.

Watch it in the demo

Stateful Personas

A persona that remembers. Who is listening carries from one message to the next: who they are, what moves them, their state of mind and their setting.

Configure one in the interactive demo

Objective-based Scoring

Every score is computed against a goal someone stated, so a number always answers a question: better at what, and for whom. That is what makes it comparable, auditable and fair to argue with.

The loop that learns

A conversation is a graph.

Replies, support and attack, with momentum flowing along the edges. Pulp is building a graph neural network that lives on that structure, compares its readings with what actually happened, and corrects itself. The firms that measure outcomes have no mechanism. The firms that generate language have no measurement. Pulp is building the loop between them, and the layer that ties every score to its reasons.

How the Pulp conversational model works

Want your words measured?

Send a draft, a transcript or a thread. We'll walk you through every rung.

Get in touch

Pulp

Color mode

Roll into a random page on Pulp. A few hidden pieces can only be accessed by taking a chance.

Get in touch

Color mode

Kept on this device only.

What are you trying to understand?

An address we can reply to, like name@example.com.
A question, a dataset, an argument that keeps going in circles.

Get in touch
Roll into a random page on Pulp. A few hidden pieces can only be accessed by taking a chance.