Skip to content
Get in touch

How does the attention economy keep corrupt politicians in power?

Media saturation, money, and incumbency let corrupt leaders turn control of attention into lasting, hidden influence.

M.D., NYU

ActiveAttention
Political sociologyCampaign financeAccountability

Hypotheses.

What the paper argues, written so it can be tested.

  1. H1

    When a corruption scandal is about to break or is breaking, the officials involved put out more ads, announcements, and friendly stories, and the scandal gets a smaller share of the coverage.

  2. H2

    Officials with more undisclosed money behind them and longer time in office see scandal coverage fade faster, and they keep their seats more often after a scandal.

The model.

Three levers feed one loop. Media saturation, dark money, and incumbency crowd public attention, and algorithms amplify whatever is loudest. Scrutiny loses out to scandal fatigue and weaker watchdogs, so the official keeps power, and kept power adds to incumbency.

THREE LEVERSPUBLIC ATTENTIONWHAT FOLLOWSMedia saturationframing and distractionDark moneypays for reach in secretIncumbencyfree coverage from officeCrowdedalgorithms amplifythe loudest andthe angriest postsLess scrutinyscandal fatigueweaker watchdogsstories fade fastPower keptmisdeeds stay hiddenPREDICTED LOOPReelection addsto incumbency
THREE LEVERSMedia saturationframing and distractionDark moneypays for reach in secretIncumbencyfree coverage from officeALL THREECrowded attentionalgorithms amplify theloudest and angriest postsLess scrutinyscandal fatigue, weakerwatchdogs, stories fadePower keptmisdeeds stay hiddenDASHED: PREDICTED LOOPReelection adds to incumbency.
Drawn from the paper. Dashed lines show what the model predicts.

Partial abstract.

How saturation coverage, dark money, and microtargeting crowd out scrutiny as investigative journalism declines. The paper argues that scandal fatigue and algorithmic amplification let incumbents turn attention into durable influence.

How the Attention Economy Lets Corrupt Politicians Keep Power and Evade Scrutiny

Key sources

  • Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection.
  • Mayer, J. (2016). Dark money: The hidden history of the billionaires behind the rise of the radical right.
  • Boczkowski, P. J. (2021). Abundance: On the experience of living in a world of information plenty.

How we’ll test it.

No results yet. This is the plan: the data, the measure, and what would count as support.

Awaiting data

The data

Corruption cases such as the Householder scandal in Ohio, with each official’s ad spending, press releases, and disclosed and undisclosed funding, next to the news coverage before and after the case broke.

The measure

The share of coverage about the scandal against the official’s own messaging, how fast scandal coverage fades, and whether the official keeps office.

What would count as support

Officials who spend more, rely on more hidden money, and have held office longer crowd out scandal coverage faster and keep their seats more often than similar officials without those advantages.

How it connects to Pulp.

Pulp’s digital civics work.

Also in Attention

Doing work like this?

Students from any school or field, and mentors from academia or industry: get in touch.

Get involved

Pulp

Color mode

Roll into a random page on Pulp. A few hidden pieces can only be accessed by taking a chance.

Get in touch

Color mode

Kept on this device only.

What are you trying to understand?

So we know who to write to.
An address we can reply to, like name@example.com.
A question, a dataset, an argument that keeps going in circles.

Get in touch
Roll into a random page on Pulp. A few hidden pieces can only be accessed by taking a chance.